I’m working on a philosophy writing question and need a sample draft to help me study.

This question is asking about writing two replies for two students’ posts. (The teacher is very very strict, so my grades really need help.) Please answer considerably and thoughtfully. I will attach this session’s pdf to look up and use this pdf as Sources to reply to TWO students. also, I attach multiple students post that could provide you to choose. plus, let me know who you reply. thank you so much. )

The student’s post is about these three topics:

1. Explain what Hume means when he says that any IDEA in our mind must first come from our senses (IMPRESSIONS).
2. Explain his idea that we do NOT see any power in objects by which they are able to bring about certain effects or a necessary connection between CAUSE and EFFECT?
3. Do you agree with Hume that our minds simply manufacture the idea of ‘secret’ power in a cause by which it brings about an effect or a necessary connection between CAUSE and EFFECT just like we manufacture (imagine) the idea of a golden mountain or the idea of a centaur (half human half horse)? Explain.

Grading Criteria for the reply :

write a reply identifying (a) ONE important point or issue made, (b) an analysis or explanation of this point or issue, (c) whether you agree or disagree with their stance or view, and (d) why you agree or disagree with their stance or view by providing reasons. Don’t write things such as “Nice post,” “Great post,” “Well written,” “I like the post,” “Very thoughtful,” etc. We are not asking for your commentary on or an evaluation of the Response. Your Reply should follow the grading criteria. Your reply must be a minimum of 200 words

A reply will be graded based on how well you understand the material andissues, and how appropriate, reasoned, detailed, critically reflective, and thoughtful yourresponse and reply are. For instance, if you simply say in your reply: “I agree” or “I disagree”or “I think s/he is right or correct,” or “I think s/he is wrong or incorrect,” without providingdetailed and thoughtful reason(s), you will get zero (0) points.

Reply: (5 points) Deduct 1 point if it does not meet the 200 minimum words requirement. o (1) Identify one (1) issue and whether they agree/disagree. (1 point) o (2) Discuss, explain, or analyze the one issue identified—not many issues. (2 points) o (3) Provide reasons for agreeing or disagreeing (2 points))